
Second Republic Project
Welcome to an 'inch of difference'. "This inch in which we live." Richard Neville, Oz, 1971.
As there is, according to the UK’s House Banking Committee Staff report of 1976, a linear connection between N.M. Rothschild and the Bank of England which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York, it is clear that the FED is not left with any choice but to bail out 'investment' banks no matter how naughty their behaviour has been.PS Don't forget to tune in at 7pm to see our own dear Vinnie doing what he does best - being light on his toes and shuffling around in the glare of the spotlight.
YouTube account GoodFightLad has been terminated because we have received multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants, including:
Islam Channel Ltd
Not really, only joking.Under the Act twelve or more persons can constitute a Riot and three or more persons can constitute a Violent Affray . I blame myself for not noting that little jewel of legislation - too busy working for a living. No wonder they wanted to close down pubs and Churches.An Act to abolish the common law offences of riot, rout, unlawful assembly and affray and certain statutory offences relating to public order; to create new offences relating to public order; to control public processions and assemblies; to control the stirring up of racial hatred; to provide for the exclusion of certain offenders from sporting events; to create a new offence relating to the contamination of or interference with goods; to confer power to direct certain trespassers to leave land; to amend section 7 of the Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875, section 1 of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, Part V of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980 and the Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol etc.) Act 1985; to repeal certain obsolete or unnecessary enactments; and for connected purposes.[7th November 1986]
The European Year has been a success, raising awareness through more than 700 projects in 29 countries and creating a strong momentum that has mobilised politicians, stakeholders and citizens. It has put the political spotlight on poverty reduction and has helped us to crystallise the premise that combating social exclusion is an economic necessity and must be an integral part of our recovery strategy.It's all in the public interest and all for the good of the cause. Of course it is. Anyone who now believes that governments of any stripe will act for the people who elect them is a Muppet Extraordinaire - and that includes students. Politics has changed and left & right should stop and re-assess their values.
"Over the last 10 years, there has been significant real growth in the resources going into the NHS, most of it funding higher staff pay and increases in headcount. The evidence shows that productivity in the same period has gone down, particularly in hospitals."If ever proof were needed that more money doesn't equal better outcomes the NHS, education, overseas aid and the EU tell you all you need to know.
As Clegg sought to explain it to the public, the real issue for his intensely pro-Europe rank-and-file was not the Lisbon Treaty itself, but confirming UK membership in the EU once and for all. The Lib Dem official position therefore was to propose an alternate "in or out" referendum on whether the UK should remain in the EU, and abstain on the competing Conservative motion to hold a referendum on just the Treaty itself.
"The real reason, of course, why the government does not want to hold a referendum is the fear that it may lose... Nothing will do more damage to the pro-European movement than giving room to the suspicion that we have something to hide, that we do not have the 'cojones' to carry out our argument to the people."Yes, it was Clegg and now that he's in bed with Cameron, another one with no cojones, the possibility of a referendum looks ever more remote.
"So what will we ask for? Depressingly, it seems we have no bottom line. The only concrete request in the Coalition Agreement [is]that the scope of the 48-hour maximum working week be reduced. Yet our Brussels officials are too timid – or too committed to deeper integration – to push even for this paltry trophy."
It had been widely thought Sweden had made the decision to oppose bail, with the CPS acting merely as its representative. But today the Swedish prosecutor's office told the Guardian it had "not got a view at all on bail" and that Britain had made the decision to oppose bail.
Lawyers for Assange reacted to the news with shock and said CPS officials had told them this week it was Sweden which had asked them to ensure he was kept in prison.
'Greece is insolvent, Portugal has a liquidity problem, Spain has a liquidity problem, Belgium has been cooking the books for a long time, Italy has been cooking the books for a long time and the UK is totally insolvent.'As one commenter succinctly says: "Here's my economic prediction for 2011 - we're ****ed." To that I can only add that someone, somewhere is growing very, very rich on the back of all this.
...While debt owed by the British government is less, relatively, than the amounts faced by Ireland, Greece or Japan, the UK's debts in total are 466% of annual economic output once consumer debt is included. That's second only to Japan.
Faced with dwindling resources, ministers stressed the need to give "new impetus" to military collaboration in order to "safeguard the defence capabilities required" to support the EU's common security policy.The EC is backing calls for a single EU-wide patent .
They also backed a German-Swedish initiative urging partners to identify tasks that could be shared -- from air transport to training facilities -- to ensure that Europe maintains its "ability to act credibly in crises."
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso refused to receive the document , sending the EU's health commissioner John Dalli instead. Mr Dalli welcomed the petition, but warned that the ECI had not been fully set up yet, drawing a question mark over the anti-GMO document ...leading the commission to brandish the anti-GMO initiative as illegitimate. "Strictly speaking, they would have to do it all over again."There are doubts about the Euro in its present format:
The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) claims that keeping "the euro alive will require cuts in living standards greater than the UK faced in the Second World War" for weaker eurozone members. There is no modern history of falling living standards in peacetime on the scale necessary to keep the euro in its current form. This is why I think there is at best a one-in-five chance that the euro will survive as it is.Fianna Fail and Fine Gael are at loggerheads over the Memorandum of Understanding with the EU and the IMF. (Also, Irish troops are being sent to the Lebanon as part of a UN taskforce).
"The EU is a corrupt organisation that has not had its accounts signed off for the past 16 years. So to see it hand over billions of euros to countries such as Serbia and Albania to fight corruption is frankly ludicrous. Has it not crossed their minds that the money they are giving to eradicate corruption in the police and judiciary is falling straight into the hands of those who are responsible for the corruption in the first place?..."
The forum hosted a fashion show, a "Fight Poverty" awards ceremony and "Music against Poverty" photo contest. All participants were invited to a cocktail party with unlimited champagne and expensively catered canapes at the close of the event on Tuesday.Joke of the week:
"David Cameron is "paralysed" by euroscepticism...they are focusing on domestic naval gazing, with a dog's dinner of a Bill in Parliament seeking to placate and soothe the seething Euroscepticism..."Or it could be this Clegg for EU Commissioner?
David Cameron is ready to parachute the Lib Dem leader into Brussels as Britain’s EU Commissioner amid fears Mr Clegg will struggle to hold his seat as an MP at the next election, say Downing Street sources. The Deputy PM would replace Labour peer Baroness Ashton in the post which carries a £239,000 salary and perks package worth another £100,000 a year.The UK is fighting for Turkey's accession to the EU:
"We need to be bold, we need to be true to the vision which inspired the enlargement process," said Britain's Europe Minister David Lidington on joining talks in Brussels over the path to enlarging the 27-nation bloc.EP President, Jerzy Buzek, is taking the peace.
"To Liberal Democrats who fear their deal with the Tories is shifting the gravity of British politics to the Right, I invite them to work with us against the direction in which this Government is taking Britain."Has everybody gone completely mad? Since when has this coalition been right-wing, if anything it's europhile centre-left thanks to the LibDems. Few policies have changed since Labour were kicked out (and shame on those who told pollsters they'd vote for them again) and some which were to be dropped have been re-instated. It's true they're looking to sell the remnants of the country's assets (the Tote, air traffic control, woodland etc) but that alone doesn't make them 'right-wing'. Stupid, greedy, thieving b@st@rds it's true - but that isn't a trait exclusive to right-wingers.
"If a pub is open from 11 until 11, there is no reason why one cannot buy stamps and get driving licence forms and so on there. There are also aspects such as the internet hub."Isn't that what pubs used to be before government interference - "ideal meeting places"?
"We could use them as libraries, post offices or parcel collection points. They could also be ideal meeting places for groups."
Among the recommendations, it ... raises the possibility of introducing cash machines into the buildings. In addition to acting as a shop, it also proposes that churches consider offering others services, including dry cleaning and providing prescriptions.It's heartening to see that the guidelines suggest that "it may not be suitable to have the stores open during funerals."
"In many respects, information has never been so free...Even in authoritarian countries, information networks are helping people discover new facts and making governments more accountable.I suppose Hillary knows best but I haven't heard her raising her voice to condemn the imprisonment in China of Liu Xiaobo and the subsequent Chinese black-out of information in the press and on the internet. Her words don't tally with the American govt's actions and rhetoric about Assange either. Governments... Cake...Eat...Flack.
"During his visit to China in November, President Obama held a town hall meeting with an online component to highlight the importance of the internet. In response to a question that was sent in over the internet, he defended the right of people to freely access information, and said that the more freely information flows, the stronger societies become. He spoke about how access to information helps citizens to hold their governments accountable, generates new ideas, and encourages creativity. The United States' belief in that truth is what brings me here today.
"Blogs, email, social networks, and text messages have opened up new forums for exchanging ideas - and created new targets for censorship..."
Sir Alistair Graham, the former Chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said, “These things are best dealt with at the time of the offence rather than at some later stage under pressure from the media.”Some of the claims are pretty minor, eg an MP used one pre-paid envelope when he shouldn't, and are no doubt honest mistakes but the whole fiasco is indicative of the sense of entitlement the majority of MPs had and still have.
He said it was “obviously not” appropriate for the reports to have been buried in a corner of the Parliament website on a busy news day, adding: “It has all the hallmarks of playing everything down then publishing it on a day when the biggest news story is university fees.”
"Since the Chairman’s note is very long, I shall summarize the main points:
Finance: Western countries will jointly provide $100 billion a year by 2020 to an unnamed new UN Fund. To keep this sum up with GDP growth, the West may commit itself to pay 1.5% of GDP to the UN each year. That is more than twice the 0.7% of GDP that the UN has recommended the West to pay in foreign aid for the past half century. Several hundred of the provisions in the Chairman’s note will impose huge financial costs on the nations of the West.
The world-government Secretariat: In all but name, the UN Convention’s Secretariat will become a world government directly controlling hundreds of global, supranational, regional, national and sub-national bureaucracies. It will receive the vast sum of taxpayers’ money ostensibly paid by the West to the Third World for adaptation to the supposed adverse consequences of imagined (and imaginary) “global warming”.
Bureaucracy: Hundreds of new interlocking bureaucracies answerable to the world-government Secretariat will vastly extend its power and reach. In an explicit mirroring of the European Union’s method of enforcing the will of its unelected Kommissars on the groaning peoples of that benighted continent, the civil servants of nation states will come to see themselves as servants of the greater empire of the Secretariat, carrying out its ukases and diktats whatever the will of the nation states’ governments. Many of the new bureaucracies are disguised as “capacity-building in developing countries”. This has nothing to do with growing the economies or industries of poorer nations. It turns out to mean the installation of hundreds of bureaucratic offices answerable to the Secretariat in numerous countries around the world. Who pays? You do, gentle taxpayer. Babylon, Byzantium, the later Ottoman Empire, the formidable bureaucracy of Nazi Germany, the vast empire of 27,000 paper-shufflers at the European Union: add all of these together and multiply by 100 and you still do not reach the sheer size, cost, power and reach of these new subsidiaries of the Secretariat..."
"...draconian powers to protect sponsors such as Coca-Cola and McDonalds, from "ambush marketing" by rivals. London is required to prevent spectators from "wearing clothes or accessories with commercial messages other than the manufacturer's brand name." This would ban them from wearing football clubs' replica strips, which usually carry the name of the club's sponsor.You'd better hide that football shirt or baseball cap under the bed then. There's no specific reference to the zil lanes but they probably fall under the behaviour modification of residents. Was it really necessary to acquiesce to these demands in order to have the privilege of throwing billions at this event - an event that has left previous hosts in debt for years to come.
Games organisers must "attempt to confiscate any infringing ambush material" from spectators, although there are warnings against being "overzealous". The city authorities must also "obtain control of all billboard advertising, city transport advertising, airport advertising etc for the duration of the games and the month preceding." Olympic "brand protection teams" must "confront violators" and "conduct surveillance" across London. Police and customs officers must enforce sponsorship rules.
Britain has complied by passing an Act of Parliament which makes "ambush marketing" at the games a criminal offence and gives officials power to enter homes and seize "infringing material".
"In the context of this bill, it is any proposal to give up our freedom not to participate in Justice and Home Affairs decisions that will be subject to a referendum ... Given the strict time limits which apply to the UK's decision to exercise an opt-in - which is within three months of the receipt of a proposal - and the fact that there are thirty to forty proposals per annum, it is not possible to place a primary legislative lock or parliamentary resolution requirement on the exercise of the opt in."From Open Europe:
Justice and home affairs is the area in which the EU gains the most new powers under the Lisbon Treaty and the fastest growing item in the EU budget. Under Lisbon, the European Commission has greater powers to draw up new laws, the European Parliament has the power to amend them, and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is responsible for enforcing them.ConHome has extracts from the speeches given by Conservative backbenchers including Cash & Redwood. The commenters aren't happy bunnies - here's an example:
New EU laws therefore represent a zero-sum equation: the UK Parliament and courts maintain control or it is handed to the Commission, MEPs and judges at the ECJ. The choice is clear: more or less power for Brussels.
I'm afraid we are reaching the stage where only civil disobedience will persuade our rulers to pay any attention to the electorate.