"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."

Thursday, 3 September 2009

Eric Joyce MP & PPS @ Defence Resigns

Love him or loathe him, hard leftie Eric Joyce was one of the most outspoken critics over the recent furore on MPs expenses and the subsequent sleaze issues.  He's standing by his principles again and has just resigned as Parliamentary Private Secretary to Bollox Bob Ainsworth.  It's interesting to note that Joyce is ex-Armed Forces so will perhaps understand the issues better than most.

Here's the text of his resignation letter to Gordon Brown; in it he cites the smear campaign on Gen Sir Richard Dannatt; the need for a 2nd round of elections in Afghanistan and the government's public justification for our continued presence there (ie safety on British streets); NATO allies doing too little, and Britian 'punching above our weight'. By the time the media have finished picking this apart, line by line, it will be political dynamite.

As you may know, I told Bob Ainsworth some weeks ago that I intended to step down as Parliamentary Private Secretary (PPS) to the Defence Secretary before the start of the new parliamentary term. This seems to me the least disruptive time to do that.  I have been privileged to work as PPS to four senior Labour ministers in four government departments and now feel that I can make my best contribution to the Labour effort in parliament by concentrating on helping, as a regular back-bencher, to show that Labour remains sound on matters of Defence.
Labour was returned to power in 1997 on the back of your great success in turning the Economy from a weakness into a strength for Labour. Our continuing success in helping people from all parts of society become more prosperous, while helping the least well-off most, is built upon that.  More quietly, during the 90's, Labour's then shadow defence team showed how Labour had become, after the disaster of the early 1980s, 'sound' on Defence.  It seems to me that your personal success on the economy won the deal in 1997, while colleagues at Defence sealed it.

We are now, I think, once again at a critical time for Labour and Defence.  The Conservatives, of course opportunistically, think they can convince the public that we have lost our empathy with the Defence community.  We must not allow this to happen.  I know that you have great commitment to our armed forces and this was clear when you visited Afghanistan this week, yet there seem to me to be some problems which need fixing with the greatest urgency.
As you know, two Black Watch soldiers gave their lives during your visit.  I do not think the public will accept for much longer that our losses can be justified by simply referring to the risk of greater terrorism on our streets.  Nor do I think we can continue with the present level of uncertainty about the future of our deployment in Afghanistan.

I think we must be much more direct about the reality that we do punch a long way above our weight, that many of our allies do far too little, and that leaving the field to the United States would mean the end of NATO as a meaningful proposition.  The British people have a proud history of facing such realities.  They understand the importance of the allied effort in Afghanistan/Pakistan and I think they would appreciate more direct approach by politicians.  We also need to make it clear that our commitment in Afghanistan is high but time limited.  It should be possible now to say that we will move off our present war-footing and reduce our forces there substantially during our next term in government.
We also need a greater geopolitical return from the United States for our efforts.  For many, Britain fights; Germany pays, France calculates; Italy avoids.  If the United States values each of these approaches equally, they will end up shouldering the burden by themselves. The first place to start is an acceptance this week by them, and by the Afghanistan electoral authorities, that there must be a second round in the elections there.  I do not think the British people will support the physical risk to our servicemen and women unless they can be given confidence that Afghanistan's government has been properly elected and has a clear intent to deal with the corruption there which has continued unabated in recent years.
Most important of all, we must make it clear to every serviceman and woman, their families and the British public that we give their well-being the highest political priority.  Behind the hand attacks by any Labour figure on senior service personnel are now, to the public, indistinguishable from attacks on the services themselves. Conversely, in my view we should allow our service personnel greater latitude to voice their views on matters which make distinctions between defence and politics pointless.
I believe the next election is ours to win, thanks greatly to your personal great economic success.  But we cannot win unless we grip defence. Above all, Labour must remember that service folk and their families are our people.  We say that we honour them for their risk, bravery and sacrifice and we must at literally all costs continue to show by our actions that we mean it. 
I intend to do what modest amount I can to help from the back-benches.
Yours sincerely
Eric Joyce MP

UPDATE: The news of Joyce's resignation went to my head last night and made me giddy with the possibilities of potential chaos in government; with Brown's Afghanistan speech due today plus two days of G20 talks his timing was immaculate. I should, of course, have paused to read my own previous blog posts about what an utter self-serving troughing shit Joyce is so no doubt there's a lot of self-preservation in his resignation. Still, whatever his motives, at least Brown's in trouble again.


  1. Joyce is an idiot


    Whilst I do not disagree with him resigning he has a very bad history of pig troughing Perliamentary expenses of Napoleonic proportions (animal farm Napoleon)

    This video shows him to be a seriously mixed up so maybe he is passing through a period of very personal problems and is now unberdening himself.

    He is toast next GE anyway

  2. sorry for spelling typos, but meaning should be evident

  3. Yes, I seem to remember he was top trougher one year as well so maybe doing the rounds of the studios at the time of the Telegraph's MPs expenses wasn't such a good move on his part after all. Still, this is another nail in Brown's coffin. (All comments welcome, typos or not).

  4. Oh, I just commented on this story on GOT's blog, and used the same 'nail in the coffin' expression! It is pretty remarkable that Brown must now be the weakest of post-war PMs: he is undoubtedly widely detested in Westminster, mostly by Labour MPs! but, for one so weak and vulnerable, where are the stalking horses?

  5. Another one bites the dust. And good riddance, rat. Enjoy the sight of the sinking liner from the distance on your plank, Eric.

  6. Labour don't do stalking horses - if they did they could have been rid of Brown on two separate occasions, but they haven't got the guts!

  7. This country is way out of depth in debt and to expect our brave young men and women to fight for their lives on a shoestring and is despicable.
    We have no leadership in government, this is because we have a government made up of Brown's cronies with little ability and intelligence. And as for Eric Joyce to write to Brown and say "I believe the next election is ours to win, thanks greatly to your personal great economic success." Is he taking the piss or not?

  8. Spot on Oliver. His tongue must have been firmly in his cheek when he wrote that.


Related Posts with Thumbnails