"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."

Wednesday, 14 October 2009

Right On, Sister

Why are people like Jo Brand given air-time to tell us their political views?  I'm sick and tired of 'celebrities' being quick to come forward with their view of the world and lecture the rest of us.  Some years ago the actor Gordon Jackson featured in an ad promoting some sort of margarine.  The ad was quickly pulled when competitors complained that it was an unfair advantage because he was so readily believed by a gullible public.  Nothing less should apply to Brand and her potty views on racism.  Jo Brand: pulled or culled?

With thanks for the video to English Rose

9 comments:

  1. So, if someone now calls her "white trash" that´s not racist?

    ReplyDelete
  2. GV she's got no idea.

    White was the lowest of the low in the Caribean, Mulatto, Myskeet, Negro all were higher up the pecking order than a white person with no master.

    She obviously doesn't know about the white slaving that goes on to this day.

    Or is completely ignorant of the millions of whites stolen from western Europe by Islamic slavers, usually Dutch Jew turn coats, over the centuries from 1400 or so.

    And if she and her ilk have their way we will soon be politically powerless and so by her definition we'll be subject to racist abuse AGAIN.

    Anyone saying those words about any other group would have the baying, braying PC mob down their throats.

    That's why there is NEVER any white history month or any such because it would become clear to all that the only group ever to fight it's way out of slavery all by itself is us, and they want us to forget.

    Asswipes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The woman's mad, the only problem is she's not the only one to hold this view. It's really skewed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. She seems to be saying that white people are, by definition, supremacists. I also gather that because I have a very acute dislike of thieving bastard travellers,based on my considerable experience of them, then I am prejudiced? OK, so I'm prejudiced - but only until proved otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nelson: "But you must hate a Frenchman as you hate the
    devil."
    Hardy: "I wouldn't let the ship's diversity co-ordinator
    hear you saying that sir. You'll be up on disciplinary
    report."
    Nelson: "You must consider every man an enemy, who speaks
    ill of your King."
    Hrdy: "Not any more, sir. We must be inclusive in this
    multicultural age. Now put on your Kevlar vest; it's the
    rules. It could save your life"
    Nelson: "Don't tell me - Health and Safety. Whatever
    happened to rum, sodomy and the lash?"
    Hardy: As I explained, sir, rum is off the menu and there's
    a ban on corporal punishment."
    Nelson: "What about sodomy?"
    Hardy: "I believe that is now legal, sir."

    Nelson: "In that case................................ kiss me, Hardy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Hogday, yes, she does seem to be saying if you're white you're automatically a supremicist because whites have more vested political power. It's just blather.
    Here's the full text of the Nelson joke:
    Nelson at Trafalgar

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lefty logic always contains an implicit or explicit contradiction. In brand's case, it is explicit: it is not 'racism' if the race is 'White'. This is pretty much the same as saying 'It is not a bottle if it is green'.

    ReplyDelete
  8. As you say Edgar: vacuous shite.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Using the same logic... can you be derogatory about white, fat old slags?

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts with Thumbnails